Today has generated a lot of questions and confusion. We know it hasn't been easy for everyone. Going forward, we'll be taking a closer look at our own harassment policies, with the aim to update them. Our thoughts and plans:https://yt.be/help/zxSq
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube
I believe some of this is based on
@Youtube’s change of decision. After review, the claims against Crowder’s channel were dismissed and explained in detail why, and then the decision was reversed.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
The "detailed" explanation was a simple We saw no violation. Later they said "it was in a debate" Then after *actually* reviewing they somehow saw the issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @GermanLizard @JackLCreative and
Don't be stupid. Whatever you think of Youtube they are a massive company, they aren't going to release a statement about a creator (which they never do) without actually reviewing what he did. What happened is they found no violation but then realised that upset people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDonnz @JackLCreative and
Umm... they literally marked a Tetris Video as violating terms of service in the area of cruel content. Yeah sure they review content lol
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GermanLizard @JackLCreative and
That's an automated system, just like any other social platform in the world. They literally contacted Steven about it, clearly they manually reviewed it. What was the issue/violation they saw, somehow you know more than them, they said there was no violation of their policies.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDonnz @GermanLizard and
Except the "socialism is for figs shirt" they said he needs to take down the link on his youtube videos to the shirt. There were two videos they had a problem with aswell, one was an interview with a british woman talking about Muslim rape gangs (who got convicted) who got raped.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iDonnz @JackLCreative and
It is f*gs and based on how you use censorship they explicitely and willingly wanted to give the T-Shirt a slur term but try to use incorrect defense to justify it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GermanLizard @JackLCreative and
Honestly don't know what the paragraph means. The idea is to make people seem stupid for thinking it says fag (which is a shitty thing to begin with) instead of figs, its a play on words with Che Guevara who was a socialist (under castro) who got executed in La Higuera, means fig
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Apparently you don't understand the concept of censoring to know why he majorly f*cked up on the T-shirt thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. I'm a gay? Scalie 
Tolerant to all*. I don't tolerate hateful humans. Everyone deservs respect. I like to chat.^^