It shows they are intelligent but it does not make them experts.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
A true skeptic neither automatically accepts nor rejects an idea until it had been tested and verified. As climate change has been and continues to be. Automatic belief is blind faith and automatic dismissal is narrow minded denial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Awaiting your peer reviewed evidence challenging the Milankovitch Climate Theory. Or even a general dissertation as to how North America was under a sheet of ice 2 million years ago, or why it was 20-40º F warmer during the Cretaceous.
-
Since you didn't provide a link, is it this? From Heartland institute https://www.desmogblog.com/iceagenow
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oh look Fernando's back! How long before he disappears again? My guess is he'll make a ridiculous statement then disappear when challenged on it!pic.twitter.com/ynuOeTP22T
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
They can however be well funded to create an illusion of expertise The group's most visible product is the website, Climate Depot, a contrarian news source run by Marc Morano. Climate Depot sees itself as the rapid reaction force of the anti-climate cause
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bullshit. Doesn't anyone in your following call you out on this? Scientific "elitism" is the same as any other. An attempt to rule rather than a means of empowerment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Leaving aside your silly propaganda points, why do you keep ignoring the peer-reviewed science you don’t like ? For example https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682618305030 ….
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
