"It went well. It was an engaged court." "The questions showed that the Justices read their briefs and understood our argument." "It's tough to predict. But I thought that we had a good morning before the court." Chad M. Clamage, Counsel for Petitioner Weyerhaeuser Co. #SCOTUS
-
-
Show this thread
-
"I thought that the Justices were talking past each other." "It was hard for me to see a common theme among the opinions of the Justices." -
@SeanHecht, Counsel for Amici Curiae Scientists#SCOTUS#DuskyGopherFrog#WeyerhaeuserShow this thread -
Chad Clamage says no proof that the designation helps the
#duskygopherfrog at all. "The designation of it as a critical habit does not compel the land owner to do anything."#SCOTUSShow this thread -
.
@heinzerlaw points out that there were many different perspectives on what would be required to bring the habitat area up to standard to support the frog.#SCOTUS#duskygopherfrogShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.