Georgetown Law Retweeted Daniel Rice
New article by @GeorgetownICAP associate @daniel_b_rice. "Through the little-known expedient of “confining a case to its facts,” courts can evade the pull of stare decisis by overruling everything a decision stands for except its precise result." Read: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3240320 …https://twitter.com/daniel_b_rice/status/1037461861640429568 …
Georgetown Law added,
Daniel Rice @daniel_b_rice
I've just posted a new article entitled "Confining Cases to Their Facts," co-authored with Jack Boeglin (and forthcoming in @VirginiaLawRev). We critique the little-examined practice of overruling everything a case stands for except its precise result:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3240320 …
0 replies
1 retweet
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.