GeoengWatch Debunked

@GeoeWatchDebunk

Geoengineering may become necessary in the future but Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch propagates the delusion that it's already happening. I debunk it.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @GeoeWatchDebunk

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @GeoeWatchDebunk

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    claims that geoengineering (jet aircraft spraying particulates) is ongoing, but none of the "proof" he offers is valid.

    Poništi
  2. 2. velj

    Zero Hedge is a Bulgarian-run conspiracy site: "Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left."

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    This argument assumes: If X is studied at Harvard then X is happening in the real world. Topics studied at Harvard include: witchcraft, world peace, nuclear war, and interstellar travel. Most (all?) of these are not happening now. Please rethink.

    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    Also, the quote from Kravitz 2009 is taken badly out of context to make it appear that scientists want to pour the maximum amount of sulfuric acid onto ecosystems. In fact, it is about an assumption for the calculation to estimate the worst possible outcome.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 31. sij

    Also, the article says "If multiple SRM schemes like SCoPEx are deployed they could ...". This is incorrect, as SCoPEx is not an SRM scheme, and cannot be "deployed", it is just a planned small experiment that would make a few measurements to inform research.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    Here's a glaring error. While the article claims sulfate deposition from geoengineering would "negatively impact most ecosystems", the paper it cites actually concludes the opposite.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 31. sij

    From this article, we learn that men are evil capitalists who want to rape Mother Nature with geoengineering, while women are soft and caring who want to live with Nature and save the world. The author backs up her argument with a number of factual errors.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Ship tracks (and a hidden contrail or two) off the European coast today.

    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    Yet another dumb, misleading article by the notorious , conflating "chemtrails" and geoengineering and pretending the chemtrail theory has actually been true. What's been funded is RESEARCH into geoengineering, not actually doing it.

    Poništi
  10. 29. sij

    Delta Airlines fuel dump over schoolchildren on Jan 14 was probably necessary to prevent the plane from bursting into flames upon landing, killing passengers. Whether it could have been done at higher altitude or less populated area should be clarified.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    This paper outlines an initial design for an aircraft that could deploy stratospheric aerosol geoengineering at scale, finding that ~80 aircraft would be needed to deploy 1 Mt SO2. Some more highlights follow 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. ruj 2016.

    All fluff, no substance: exhange with Dane Wigington the promoter

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Public funding for geoengineering is overdue. Here's the quote I sent John “It’s terrific news. An important step forward. NOAA is the right agency to do this work.” Sent late as I was in rural Bangladesh ()

    Poništi
  14. 26. sij
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. sij

    Take a quick dip or a deep dive into the governance of Solar Radiation Modification with our infographics, policy brief and evidence brief at

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    US NOAA's boss "said he has received $4 million from Congress and permission from his agency to study two emergency—and controversial—methods to cool the Earth if the U.S. and other nations fail to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions." ("if")

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    "Scientists are exploring a radical idea: dimming the sun. If it works, solar could be a last-ditch option to buy time and avert ecological disaster. But it raises ethical, legal, and geopolitical questions." with et al

    Poništi
  18. 22. sij

    I wonder what reps actually thought of that bill. Did they realize it was written by chemtrail conspiracy nutters?

    Poništi
  19. 22. sij

    This is the article she shows to prove that cell towers have a role in geoengineering. All it says is that rain intensity can be measured by how much the microwave links between cell towers are attenuated by rainfall. Nothing to do with geoengineering.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 22. sij

    At the Rhode Island hearing, believer Jolie Diane claimed can be measured by an EMF meter, as she showed, claiming that cell towers and microwaves have an important role in geoengineering. Absurd idea, geoengineering cannot be done with microwaves.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 21. sij

    Rhode Island representative Justin Price provides a quick-witted answer to the question "How would you recognize an act of to be able to report it?" Easy, just detect electromagnetic fields and buranium! 😆

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·