Same for attacking boys’ genitals.
No. No,no,no. Male circumcision is nowhere near as bad as female circumcision. The former removes a dispensable piece of skin. The latter removes an actual organ. When male circumcision involves removing the glans or head of the penis itself, it will be comparible. Til then, No.
-
-
By extension, removing just a bit of live skin from the vagina or clitoris would be acceptable to you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Consent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Taking a knife to the genitals of someone incapable of consent should be criminal regardless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Male circumcision removes the most sensitive part of the penis: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 and FGM is not all one thing: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/overview/en/ … Type Ia FGM is removal of prepuce but not clitoris - analogous to male circumcision. You can't condemn one and defend the other.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Free marketeer.