One area people's intuitions seem very split on is whether it feels actively dangerous to have things that most people agree on but nobody is willing to say.
Show this thread
-
Got it, thanks. In that case, the best-of-both-worlds option would be clearing the way for acceptance of X by attacking the belief that X => Y, either by trying to change people's minds directly, or by changing the world so that fewer people will be drawn to it.
