We tend to only consider it "thinking" if you're doing it on your own off in your own head, but almost everything you do involves thinking, and many other modes of thinking succeed even by the standards you'd want to judge "real thinking" by, they just seem less legitimate.
-
Show this thread
-
Easy example: Writing about something is a great way to think about it. Writing is very much a tool for assisted thinking. It is possible to have much better and more interesting thoughts by writing about it than you ever could off in your own head.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
So is conversation. A conversation partner is a much more opinionated aid to thinking than writing is, but that has strengths and weaknesses - having a conversation with someone allows you to think things together than neither of you could have thought on your own.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
In fact, almost all thinking is a form of conversation with the world: You build on things you have learned from others, and you put it back out into the world where you get feedback on it. The difference between "conversation" and "real thinking" is mostly latency.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Someone who is doing "real thinking" has deliberately separated themselves a bit from the conversation to give them time to reflect. This is neither better nor worse than the more immediate conversation, they just have different strengths.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
But importantly both are thinking and both are good at the same things in a broader sense - they're just variants of the same basic tool. Despite this we've decided that one is thinking and one is communicating, but this is a completely fake distinction.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Anyway, this is where the gender thing comes in I think: Heavily collaborative work is female coded, and heavily solitary work is male coded. As a result, the more feminine coded something is the more likely it is to be branded "not thinking".
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Made in Cosmos 💫 Retweeted Made in Cosmos 💫
I definitely think best when talking things through with someone, but never saw it as a gendered thing. Outspoken guys who seem to dominate every conversation are probably in the same boat.https://twitter.com/made_in_cosmos/status/1265740165689094145?s=20 …
Made in Cosmos 💫 added,
Made in Cosmos 💫 @made_in_cosmosReplying to @diviacarolineOne thing I learned from my boss is that some people think while talking and other people need to have everything thought through before they speak up, and it's crucial to create space for the second kind or the conversation will change topic before they have a chance to speak.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @made_in_cosmos
There are definitely men who think by talking but I think the gendered split on that is talking-at vs talking-with. (And of course there are men who do talking-with and women who do talking-at, and many other combinations, these are just tendencies)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
I’ve done a lot of both, and to me the difference is primarily of style rather than substance. Some people enjoy verbal sparring like they would competitive sports. Other prefer to make sure everyone feels heard and understood. Both can be used to discover truth when done right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, all the different modes of doing this are useful, but I do think it goes beyond personal preference and each of them has different strengths and weaknesses for achieving a goal.
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Yeah totally, it’s always good to have multiple tools at your disposal
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.