Minorities (e.g. sex, race) sometimes form subgroups within larger groups ("Women in Tech", "African Americans in Finance") and these can be awesome even if you ban them from discussing the trait that makes them different together.
-
Show this thread
-
Note; I've experienced this with gender and assume it generalizes to other traits, but would be very interested in hearing if I'm wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
In communities that are very big, X in Y can be pleasantly small. You see the same people frequently but not too frequently, get new people pleasantly often but not to often. It can be a mutual aid thing where you have more expectation of receiving help so you give more help.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
I think I ended up benefiting from being female when I went into the crypto space, because women were so happy to see another woman that they were very helpful, much more help than a new man could expect to get.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
This dynamic can coexist with discrimination or harassment against the minority. They don't cancel out.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
I've never seen the good parts of the X in Y dynamic duplicated with a random group of the same size. Maybe you need to be easily identifiable. Maybe the discrimination creates a shared bond.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
You can't duplicated it with a subgroup based on a narrower interest either- one of the cool thing about X in Y groups is the cross section of ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
I wonder if this is part of why microidentities are useful for people.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.