GeniesLoki

Counterpoint: if this is the case why does everyone have a Hogwarts house? (I am not as negative about SSC as Erin but I'd still hesitate to recommend his work without a lot more context TBH)

I guess to add to this: I put SSC in the same category as a lot of woo. He is worth reading and trying to extract value from, but the process is intrinsically a slightly adversarial one and taking him too seriously is worse than not reading him.

Reading him is a net positive if you're able to cleanly separate the good bits from the bad bits, but he isn't going to do that for you (because he can't), and I'd rather people not take on either than take on both.

What do you think the bad bits are?

He's very confident of his position and he's very big on "principle of charity" as a talking point but he's not actually very good at being charitable to competing worldviews. Most blatant example is that basically every time feminism comes up you need to salt the post liberally.

Did we read the same blog? Because that does not describe what I remember at all. SSC got a bunch of politicized responses, and those drove a lot of non-reader opinions, in ways largely unrelated to the actual content. I can't help but feeling like that's also going on here.

fwiw i thought the tone of his post on say Jordan Peterson was incredibly uncharitable

"But guys, Twelve Rules For Life is actually good." That's uncharitable? Someone admitting their preconceptions against you and then saying they were wrong, in the opening paragraph? What the hell does charitable look like?