GeniesLoki

Feminism really does have a problem with systematically rejecting the places where the theory naturally could and should be extended to men, and the way it treats groups like this who have male-coded problems (and are also majority but not exclusively men) really brings it out.

If you don't believe me try saying "female privilege" to your average feminist and see how they react. Privilege is a really useful framework for looking at a bunch of problems that men face that women don't. It's perfectly possible for both male and female privilege to exist.

"female privilege" to trans men is more like... "structural oppression" again oops Infantilization is not privilege

Cannot tell whether agreeing or disagreeing. Could you unpack?

It's super tangential to what you were saying. I agree and disagree? Infantilization meaning-- people doing things for you because they think you're too weak to do them is a good example. A lot of other men I know call that a "privilege" but it's fucking condescending to me.

I'm sure you'll be able to find some examples of female privilege that don't fall into this category.

Some go to examples for me: * Hetero dating norms around "men approach women" * Men are typically very touched starve * Safety in expressing emotions (especially ones that will be perceived as scary)

Counterpoints *These same hetero dating norms are based on assumptions like "women don't make the kind of money needed to cover a date," and many are the product of capitalism *none *Women are not "allowed" to express "male emotions" like anger in this social paradigm either