Thought loosely spinning off this morning's pages: One of the reasons a lot of male feminists are kinda miserable is that the lack of a male lived experience informed theory means that often you remove one half of a message but not the other and the result is unsustainable.
-
-
"a division of labour, with each side taking care of the other in slightly different ways" - what kind of labour are you talking about here? Like mainly emotional support type stuff or more division of housework?
-
Interesting thread, personally I feel that feminism has overwhelmingly done good things for my relationships
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Write a book.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think there's a thing where the downside of having a standardized division of labour is that it's unfair for a lot of people. But the downside of having a "everyone make their own version" is that it's harder to tell if something is fair because you can't compare it to "normal"
-
Yeah. There's also the "Origins of Unfairness" argument that actually a standardised division of labour is often great for everyone when compared to its absence, it's just more great for one side than the other.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Oh uh hmm...
End of conversation
-
-
-
I don't think we pay enough attention in general to how various conflicting cultural-scale belief systems end up as inter- and intra- personal tensions We tend to focus on effects of one belief system or another, and not of simultaneously internalizing two conflicting ones...
-
Huge +1 to this, yeah.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.