For example your traditional heterosexual relationship implicit contract is basically a division of labour, with each side taking care of the other in slightly different ways. (Which is not to say everyone is *good* at this, but best case scenario this is how it works)
-
-
Show this thread
-
But then you've got a bunch of feminist theory pointing out that many of the burdens placed on the woman in this scenario are unreasonable. Fair enough. This is true. BUT this really was two sides in the original format. Unequal maybe, but still two sided.
Show this thread -
And if you don't address both sides, what you end up with is men believing: 1. It is inappropriate for me to expect my partner to take care of me (feminism). 2. It is my duty to take care of my partner (patriarchy). This is not a fun set of beliefs to hold.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not in full agreement with the thread but that part hit me
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Oh uh hmm...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One reason could be that they internalize "men are bad" rethoric.https://twitter.com/lisatomic5/status/1315192757669879808?s=20 …
-
Yeah, indeed. I just think there are other interesting ways for it to fuck you up even once you've moved past that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.