sorry if this is dickish - but nearly every midlife person seems very lame and the worst of them all are the ones who dont accept this. im not depressed just what exactly is the point
-
I see, I thought you were reacting to the number alone proceed
I am a little bit. I think of 30 as the age when people start to have shit a bit more figured out and a lot of the interesting stuff really starts happening, so I'd be kinda reluctant to consider it midlife and would probably think of that as more like 40-60, but I care less.
-
-
But also I think my life is going to be amazing for most of the 40-60 range so it's not like it wouldn't have been a funny take without that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am too aspie for this I would 100 % agree that a lot of people get shit figured out after 30 and do a lot of interesting things, but I would also call that period midlife, just because… "mid"… again, I'm too aspie for this
-
I think of it more about division into eras of meaningfully different life stages than necessarily mid by year. But like I say, I don't care that much - perfectly happy to label midlife as 30-50 if that's useful in context.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it seems common enough that people feel 'more boring' as they get older, right? not to mention biological decline possibly if one is very career/ambition inclined, or had signif psychological problems, 30+ can seem more interesting, but that isn't vast maj of people!
-
I think most people's 30s are pretty good and almost everyone I know had/is having a more interesting time in their 30s than their 20s. Most people's 20s are the period where everything is a bit shit because they're in the real world but can't deal with it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.