GeniesLoki

I mean I did, but in retrospect I reject the question. Neither describes an implementable ethical strategy.

hmmmmmhttps://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1310426969834545159?s=19 …

I've read enough* Talmudic law to know that I hate a lot of their advice and I hate their reasoning TBH. * which I'll admit isn't a *lot*, but it's more than most people who aren't Jewish

Anyway this is basically the golden rule and the golden rule is shit because it ignores the degree to which preferences vary among people.

what about the golden metarule that takes into consideration that you would not have done unto you things that someone else would have done unto themselves but that you dont want done unto you nonetheless

I've argued with too many utilitarians to accept "if you think real hard my terrible ethical system turns into a completely different ethical system that is Actually Good" as a valid line of reasoning.

I think your about to talk yourself into endorsing the NAP

I don't think so? I'm mostly a virtue ethicist TBH