I also feel like I have a potential example of 1 + 2 + at least as much 3 as FwB, but the love experienced is still closer to a deep friendship than romance.
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
Like there seems to be a sort of Deep Friendship With Benefits which doesn't include romantic love, and I can't quite tell what romantic love *does* above and beyond that, but it's at very least a feeling that can develop after that, and possibly never does.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Huh... I guess my theory is incomplete then. Really curious what that difference might be, then. Keep me posted if you ever come any closer to figuring it out :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Elodes12
I think one missing factor is emotional intimacy. There's a level/type of that in romantic relationships that is I think missing from all but the deepest of friendships. (I still think there's something missing once you add that in, but I'm not totally sure about that)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Great suggestion. You're right, that's definitely a key component of good romantic relationships.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Elodes12
I thought I had an example of all four that didn't qualify for romance but then I concluded that it was mostly just romance plus denial.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @Elodes12
I still think there's something else there though. Maybe it's that what you're committing *too* that matters. It's possible to have a committed lifelong friendship in which all three of the other components are present but what you're committing to is not romance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Whew. At that point my gut would say that what's missing is a sense of "we'll live together forever" plus perhaps either exclusivity or (if you're poly) a commitment to forever remain each other's primary partner, plus "if we're ever having kids, we're having them together."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Elodes12 @GeniesLoki
Would you say there'd be something missing still then?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
These don't seem like necessary conditions for romance to me TBH. I think there's a lot of scope for romance without any implied commitment to a deep intertwining of lives.
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
Poly relationships definitely abound with examples of romance where the degree of life sharing possible is sharply bounded. A secondary relationship isn't non-romantic just because it can never become primary.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
But FWIW the cases I had in mind were more like... ones where two people clearly have the potential to become romantically involved, but might consciously choose to just remain friends for practical or emotional reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
