I'm not sure! "Asexual" is a pretty large umbrella term and I don't fully understand the range of variation in phenomenology of attraction.
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki
I've never heard of a person who completely lacks any kind of attraction level difference between, say, a gangrenous homeless person and an everyday model. Even nonsexually, everyone has people they like being physically close to vs. ones they don't, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Elodes12
There are definitely people who don't like to be close to anyone. Beyond that... there's a distinction between appeal, lack of repulsion, and attraction I think? Someone can be aesthetically pleasing, you might not mind being close to them, but that doesn't mean you're attracted
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
BTW I'm totally confused about the nature of romance in general, so I'm sharing the confusion rather than suggesting that I understand the answer.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
I appreciate this note :-) Since sufficiently advanced confusion can be indistinguishable from deep understanding, I'd love to hear more about your confusion around romance!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Elodes12
Hmm so one confusion is that there appears to be a distinct felt sense of romantic love independently of how committed you are to a person. People fall out of romantic love while staying committed, people have romantic love while being unable to commit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
It also depends a bit on what you mean by "commitment" - e.g. poly people are certainly capable of experiencing romantic love without a monogamous commitment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
I also feel like I have a potential example of 1 + 2 + at least as much 3 as FwB, but the love experienced is still closer to a deep friendship than romance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @Elodes12
Like there seems to be a sort of Deep Friendship With Benefits which doesn't include romantic love, and I can't quite tell what romantic love *does* above and beyond that, but it's at very least a feeling that can develop after that, and possibly never does.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Huh... I guess my theory is incomplete then. Really curious what that difference might be, then. Keep me posted if you ever come any closer to figuring it out :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think one missing factor is emotional intimacy. There's a level/type of that in romantic relationships that is I think missing from all but the deepest of friendships. (I still think there's something missing once you add that in, but I'm not totally sure about that)
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Great suggestion. You're right, that's definitely a key component of good romantic relationships.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Elodes12
I thought I had an example of all four that didn't qualify for romance but then I concluded that it was mostly just romance plus denial.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.