Is using adblocker free-riding the Internet? Do you think it's bad? I'm not using any adblocker now for this reason, which maybe is stupid. *much scruples, very hairsplit, wow*
-
-
Replying to @VectorOfBasis
No more so than not clicking on the ads would be, and there is a significant safety concern to not running an ad blocker.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Both points interesting, but I'm not sure if I agree with the first. Not viewing ads means no surveillance (or less of it). Furthermore it could be argued that part of the utility of ads comes from habituating the viewers to the brand. So clicks are not everything.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @VectorOfBasis @GeniesLoki
the last psychiatrist and i think
@KevinSimler have written about this, viz. ads are about creating common knowledge that “this product signals this characteristic”1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This is a fair point. In which case I amend my position to "Running an adblocker is ethical in the same way that resisting someone's attempts to manipulate you are ethical: It doesn't matter if they think you've consented to it unless you've actually consented."
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
I mean TBH my actual position is that I'm gonna do it regardless and anything I say on the subject is a justification after the fact. But I am really resistant to the idea that I owe anyone my attention.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.