I'm not. But I like reading to interesting but wrong stuff and chatting to interesting nerds, and they've got plenty of both, so...https://twitter.com/__justplaying/status/1301227352844914688 …
Show this thread
-
I understand rejecting utilitarianism, but what's wrong with Bayesian reasoning? (Not that I do it explicitly, as I just can't be bothered...)
Bayesian reasoning is fine for the cases to which it can reasonably be applied, but the amount of work to cast problems in a useful Bayesian form is often significantly greater than solving the problem with another method, and people tend to half-arse it instead.
-
-
Additionally frequentism is good, actually (in a both/and sort of way with Bayesianism), and it annoys me that a lot of LW-style Bayesians have frequentist foundational assumptions while simultaneously denigrating frequentism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.