here's a thing that's been bothering me re: intersectionality (which i have complex feels about) when people* talk about it, it's pretty much always race / gender and sure those are important but what about, say if someone is neurotypical? *americans 1/x
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @__justplaying
Don't worry intersectionality will catch up on neurodivergence now that we're increasingly recognising that women can be autistic too.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @__justplaying
(For a long time raising this issue was considered a male derailing tactic despite the fact that you're obviously correct)
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @__justplaying
One issue is that the boundaries for neurotypicality are fuzzier than mostly obvious physical properties like skin colour or sex. Many people are not tested/diagnosed and may not want to be, or are good enough at fitting in that people may not believe their internal struggles.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's a lot easier to demonstrate and quantify sexual discrimination that the penalties society imposes on non NT people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisgardenuk @__justplaying
I agree with this but I feel like the same is basically true of a lot of things that intersectionality recognises just fine (disabilities, sexuality)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @__justplaying
To an extent, but I somehow feel like non NT is at the harder end to measure. Maybe I'm wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Maybe. I think it depends on the type of neurodivergence. E.g. this isn't subtle or poorly understood with diagnosed ADHD
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.