I think about this a lot, really. I feel like our basic model of therapy is entirely wrong, and treating it as a thing that individuals can do to fix themselves both ignores most of its benefits and limits the ability of the individual to actually change.https://twitter.com/GeniesLoki/status/1300736048432140291 …
-
Show this thread
-
Most therapy should be group therapy with friends.
9 replies 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
i'd think of therapy as a place where you can bootstrap one (1) normal, empathetic, supportive relationship, which enables you to build the skills to get things like friends (ie. people you have normal, empathetic, supportive relationships with, not just people you hang out with)
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @owohundro @GeniesLoki
I would question that. Therapeutic relationship is very much not a normal relationship. - you only have it as long as you pay for it - support is single-sided and you know little about them - they won't socialise with you outside of the therapeutic context
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @fvathynevgl @owohundro
I think a lot of therapists / styles of therapy do believe that the therapy relationship is supposed to work like this. I couldn't stand that, for all the reasons you list, and it's part of why I stopped therapy and decided to work on it myself and with actual friends.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @fvathynevgl @owohundro
Uh, that the therapy relationship is about genuine healthy human connection and the relationship between the therapist and the patient, rather than a professional transaction in which you are paying the therapist to help you sort yourself out.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Why do those have to be mutually exclusive? Does the professional transaction negate the possibility of a genuine connection (albeit one that exists in a bounded space)?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @andreajmedaris @GeniesLoki and
I came here to ask this. Do I not have a warm human connection with my colleagues, housemates, etc because money is involved? Do I not have one with the people I volunteer to help, because they don't help me back?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The limiting factor of the therapeutic relationship is not that "money is involved" but that it's something you're paying for by the hour and goes away when you stop paying for it, which is a much more specific scenario.
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki @leonalobster and
I think it's important to have a good relationship with the therapist, but it's necessarily a fairly specific type of working relationship, and does not serve well as a prototype for relationships more broadly.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @andreajmedaris and
I agree with that. Also I've observed some confusion on the part of clients who feel they have a great friendship (or romantic connection) with their therapist. I don't think therapists typically believe this though, or that any school of therapy would encourage them to
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
on whether therapy helps at the individual level at all - I think it's much more useful to have a whole bunch of therapy skills in the water in a community than therapy is for individuals themselves.