"It is your moral duty to stoically endure a constant litany of emotional abuse without complaint, because you deserve it because of crimes committed by people who aren't you, and the fact that you think you don't deserve it is evidence that you do deserve it."
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @__justplaying
GeniesLoki Retweeted GeniesLoki
GeniesLoki added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki @__justplaying
I mean not literally that tweet, but Discourse around that subject is the context.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @__justplaying @GeniesLoki
online discourse, in general is becoming more and more abusive and vicious, unfortunately
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @__justplaying @GeniesLoki
and i think at the core of all this is two things 1. people think what they're doing is not abusive 2. people feel that the abuse is justified
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @__justplaying @GeniesLoki
3. people are really good at lying themselves saying what they're doing is not abusive/justified
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @__justplaying @GeniesLoki
which is to say, as the NYT and others so aptly put it a while back: everything is gamergate now
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
My working theory is something along the lines of: 1. People think conflict justifies abuse when it's "punching up" 2. People think that broad commentary directed at a privileged group is intrinsically punching up.
-
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki @__justplaying
I can sortof buy (1) in some special cases. e.g. I think there are a lot of cases of legitimate power struggle where many things I'd otherwise consider not OK become if not ideal at least justifiable. (2) is just false though.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.