What if the reason why women do most of the emotional labour is that we don't count it as emotional labour when men do it? (I was surprisingly reluctant to tweet this even on alt)
-
Show this thread
-
(This is even before we get to the "Well actually if you read The Managed Heart, you'll find that emotional labour *really* means..." criticism which I also think is valid)
2 replies 0 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
The basic problem is that doing emotional labour more or less requires performing gender roles, and performing feminine gender roles involve expressing emotion and performing masculine gender roles involves suppressing it. The former is much more visible than the latter.
3 replies 7 retweets 124 likesShow this thread -
GeniesLoki Retweeted GeniesLoki
GeniesLoki added,
GeniesLoki @GeniesLokiReplying to @DistractedAnnaThis is kinda what I was getting at in https://twitter.com/GeniesLoki/status/1298198816001331200 … If yo look at typical feminine examples of emotional labour yeah 100% men do less of that. Male emotional labour is generally about not exhibiting emotion rather than exhibiting it.3 replies 0 retweets 44 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Do I understand you correctly? Emotional labour for men means something like "keeping your shit together and not being controlled by emotions in difficult situations"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki @outofingroup
Well, rather, that's one example of male emotional labour, there are others.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeniesLoki
Could you name a few other examples? I'm just curious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
GeniesLoki Retweeted GeniesLoki
More examples underhttps://twitter.com/GeniesLoki/status/1298200548328513536?s=19 …
GeniesLoki added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.