I feel like people theorising the link between kinks and trauma often miss the point. You don't need complex theories to explain why someone is into a particular kink - it's just fun. What you need to explain is why people are stuck in a particular range of fun things.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GeniesLoki
So I think people (including me at first) are not understanding you because things like "kinks don't require some causal explanation" sounds like "some things are just magically inherently fun and their fun-ness is not explained by evolutionary psychology or anything".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xuenay @GeniesLoki
I think the point you're actually making is "kinks would be fun regardless: they tap into same reasons of fun as anything else, so trauma is an unnecessary inference in the same way that 'people like watching movies' is straightforward to explain without bringing in trauma".
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @xuenay @GeniesLoki
So if I'm understanding you correctly, you're not actually saying "kinks don't require an explanation" (which keeps confusing people since everything has some explanation), you're saying "you can explain kinks without trauma so why bring in trauma".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xuenay
I'm not even really saying "why bring in trauma" - I'm saying that trauma is not a necessary condition for kink, and that the trauma-kink interaction isn't so much "causing" a kink as causing people to get stuck in a particular narrow pattern of sexual behaviour.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
In any given case it may or may not be useful to consider trauma, but kink should not be considered as particularly strong evidence of trauma given that trauma is not needed to explain it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.