Dec 12, 1953 - Went Mach 2.5 in X-1A, discovered inertia coupling, tumbled on all 3 axes, knocked out when I hit the canopy. Woke up. No egress systems. And that's not good. Here's the audio: http://www.chuckyeager.com/x-1a-flight-audio …
-
-
Replying to @GenChuckYeager
What sort of aircraft were designated for chasing? Presumably they could only see a fraction of the flight because of the difference in performance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GenChuckYeager
Thanks hour the reply. I looked up the performances of the X-1 and the F-86. Seems you could go 300 miles an hour faster and about 30000 feet higher, so it would be like me chasing a 747 in my car.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @tforthodontist
F-86 started farther out. The X-1 had less than 5 minutes of fuel. Then it was a glider.
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @GenChuckYeager
Clearly there are serious aviation history enthusiasts on this thread, does anyone know what were the Russians experimenting with at a similar time?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
In 1953, they still did not have a flying tail. Their MiG-15 demonstrated that
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.