@specsmackenzie wasn’t one a bit more mechanically robust than the other?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the bet was actually whether or not you'd respond. thank you, sir: i won!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sir i just want to comment on how sharp you are at this point in time in your distinguished life! Wow! You are amazing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@specsmackenzie 1 Mission survivability against the enemy. 2 Get our men and women home safe. 3 Payload capacity. 4 RangeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Mosquito could carry its payload faster and farther.The heavy lumbering bomber not great idea.Except high flying B29
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The B17 was said to be lighter on the controls than the B24. But, the B24 flew faster, longer, w/ 3 more tons of bombs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you now understand General Yeager's reply.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Best WW2 bomber? -Lancaster, easy bet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@specsmackenzie 2 completely different airframes...both good though...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.