Of course - here you go. Play around with it. You want to understand the discrepancy? Chesa is not honest with the public.https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/stay-safe/crime-data/crime-dashboard …
-
-
Replying to @BravoSFPols @donkyourenemies and
For 2020, most show down (from previous year) except for Burglary and Motor Vehicle Theft - both of these are non-violent crimes, no? if I am not mistaken, he would rather focus on incarcerating violent ones.pic.twitter.com/sN7PcvZod8
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @BravoSFPols and
It's not surprising that those two are up and very correlated to the economic conditions we are in. I would expect to see improvement correlated with improvement in the economy, hopefully next year.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @BravoSFPols @donkyourenemies and
Right, that's where he should prioritize the DA's resources to prosecute. People should pay a price for killing someone.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @donkyourenemies and
Neil, I'm not okay with SF residents getting broken into over and over again - it's not okay and it's not normal. Or how about the poor woman yesterday who was assaulted and her dog stolen?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BravoSFPols @donkyourenemies and
I feel for any victim of any crime and when it happened to me, I was livid in the moment. I know how that feels. Assault is violence and I fully expect him to prosecute and I hope he does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @donkyourenemies and
So you don't think breaking into a garage or into a car and stealing property should be prosecuted?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BravoSFPols @donkyourenemies and
I'll play devil's advocate on this one: No, but yes, if there is *violence* towards a human or animal (pet). Breaking in and stealing, in and of itself is not violence. I am for prioritizing violent crimes - the qualifier is important IMHO.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @donkyourenemies and
So you're going to wait until that non-violent crime becomes violent when the offender confronts a civilian while a crime is in progress? This makes no sense and insane. This is also inconsistent with your claim you're for greater public safety. These are mutually exclusive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I disagree that my claim is inconsistent for greater public safety. The are many ways to achieve public safety and many have yet to be tried. Although, with #CriminalJusticeReform that has begun and supported by both parties.
We may just have to agree to disagree on this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.