Think about what it means to put a dude like Buckley onstage with someone like Baldwin. (Apologies for the millionth Baldwin/TNC analogy.)
-
-
Show this thread
-
what does it tell you abt the "referees," as it were, that they can't tell these ppl aren't even having the same conversation?
Show this thread -
What does it mean that the referees don't/can't engage the many other thinkers who capably critique whiteness? Do they not know any others?
Show this thread -
(Do the referees even know what "whiteness" is? Might that be kind of impt to discerning whether an argument holds together?
@nytopinion)Show this thread -
We're going to keep treating whiteness in America like climate change, and debate whether its a fiction while it imperils us all.
Show this thread -
You know, in the interest of "hearing both sides."
Show this thread -
And just like in that "debate," the arguments for the side that its much ado abt nothing gets more tortured as the evidence is made plainer.
Show this thread -
How seriously wd you consider an op-ed page's ability to frame the discourse on, say, gender if nearly all the ppl who ever wrote for it ...
Show this thread -
we're straight dudes? And straight white dudes? And straight, college-educated white dudes? That would be disqualifying, right?
Show this thread -
Bc that's effectively how the op-ed pages in MSM outlets have treated race for as long as we've even had anything that looks like a MSM.
Show this thread -
The consequences for this have not been abstract --- in the crafting of policy or in the creation of a polity.
Show this thread -
And it helps creates a broad consensus dedicated to its myopias, that takes unknowing as the most reasonable political position.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.