why would she allow a members vote at conference only to veto it?
-
-
Replying to @Gedk
back to the point. Is she still a multilateralist? Her website is locked.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Gedk
So. A multilateralist leader of a unilateralist party within a multilateralist party which has a unilateralist leader?
1 reply . 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @Tim_Sellick
some people are multilateralist, some are unilateralist. We're allowed to have our own opinions in the Labour party.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk @Tim_Sellick
Unless you have sympathy for the Greens or Foo Fighters
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jjstephen44 @Tim_Sellick
don't think anyone cares if you like foo fighters. If you vote green you are, by definition, not a Labour member.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk @Tim_Sellick
Then why are you expelling people who voted Green in the past. I was a Lib Dem who changed to the SNP not a problem
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jjstephen44 @Tim_Sellick
we don't allow people to vote for the leader if they're not Labour supporters.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk @jjstephen44
Seems that your definition of what is a 'labour supporter' within the membership is another schism.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes
person who supports Labour. It's very straightforward.
-
Replying to @Gedk @jjstephen44
It's an observation not an accusationpic.twitter.com/dJ7xLLUhAu
0 replies . 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.