So you believes it's acceptable for an STV editor to praise and promote anonymous online abusive trolls?
-
-
Replying to @Chris72600702 @shocker38
I believe what he says cuts too close to the bone and that's why you want him silenced.
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Gedk @shocker38
Sorry, you've answered the wrong question. Do you believe it's acceptable to praise and promote anonymous abusive trolls?
2 replies . 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Chris72600702 @shocker38
I'm not being drawn into your daft straw man arguments.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk @shocker38
It's not a daft argument at all,I would argue it makes STV look bad to have one of its editors promote such abusive account
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Chris72600702 @shocker38
you can argue that if you want. The government still shouldn't be trying to silence people in the media.
3 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk @shocker38
Forgive me, but how exactly asking a question considered "silence people in the media"
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Journalists are not above criticism, one who actively praises anonymous abusive trolls should be criticised. Agree?
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Chris72600702 @shocker38
yes. But we are not discussing whether or not a journalist can or should be criticised.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk @shocker38
I can't see how the SG are interfering or silencing the media in regards to the Daisley story.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes
oh well then, we have nothing to worry about do we?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.