sorry your obfuscation won't placate me or my opinions which are arrived at by labour's own actions, not mine, labour's
-
-
Replying to @shocker38
what am I obfuscating? I'm simply expanding the point you made, not me, you.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk
participation is parliament is not government, Tories are government, your party chose that option
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shocker38
ahh. So you're just endorsing governments. If we become Indy and the first party to win is Tories, you're endorsing them then?
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk
as a person who believes in democracy, then yes, I'd be bound to. I wouldn't support them not vote for them in any way.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shocker38
but you'd judge that lowering the minimum wage was "acceptable for Scotland" if they decided?
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk
I don't find it acceptable and neither do the people of Scotland. It's mandates we are talking, your party gave a mandate to Tories
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shocker38 @Gedk
in the illusion that it was going to be labour in power, labour gambled with Scotland and lost
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shocker38
you still haven't answered previous. In an iScotland, a Tory government lowers minimum wage. You judge that "acceptable"?
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gedk
if that's how the people of Scotland voted then they'd have a mandate. I'd fight it, as my democratic right would allow
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes
and what would you tell me, I said you'd "judged it to be acceptable to Scotland"?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.