Agree w/ some of @GaryMarcus and Davis's points here but don't find the "current AI != 'genuine AI'" framing helpful. Generality/genuineness is a spectrum; today's ML, while outputting narrow systems, is >general than previous ones. Progress is happening. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/opinion/artificial-intelligence-challenges.html …
-
-
I agree with not being at AGI, but not with the implication that AGI is a prerequisite for profound disruption (a la
@sundarpichai). I'm just saying you don't need it to massively change the world. Solving narrow tasks is plenty disruptive. PS you don't think@Waymo is ready? -
in principle i agree, but lack of reliable NLU and scene comprehension is fairly limiting. and see next tweet. (& no way are driverless cars ready for NYC)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.