I am referring to innate symbolic machinery. Deep Learning based language translators don't have innate symbolic processors but do natural language translation quite well. An intuitive system is able to simulate logic and symbolic processing, but there is no innate mechanism.
surely humans can do symbolic logic (& eg computer programming) in formal contexts. any arguments that says that symbol manipulation is not compatible w logic is too strong/clearly false.https://twitter.com/intuitmachine/status/968179324032569345 …
-
-
-
As a perfect example, how does AlphaZero do so well against a StockFish (a system based on logic programming)?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't often agree with
@IntuitMachine but he's certainly right in this respect. Doing symbolic logic is an external behavior, not the basis of intelligence. But DL experts do not realize that a DNN is also symbolic (labels are symbols) and as such, are not intelligent.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.