do you have an argument for the first part of this? my book the birth of the mind addresses the second at length
It would be arrogant for anyone to think that a billion years of evolution couldn’t come up with a single prior that captured anything beyond what is captured by convolution. spend a few seconds watching a baby ibex scrambling down a mountain and you will see what i mean...https://twitter.com/plinz/status/960213889303670785 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
I hope that you don't literally mean that "prior" info, in the sense of innate or instinctual, is to be captured by a prior probability.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
And also remember that evolution operates in _parallel_ across countless individuals, each a unique variant. Deep time with mass, parallel exploration of the phenotypic space.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hopefully we can leave the Frankenstein blind alley of singular dreams soon.
#AIThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.