oh my darwin @ylecun, you should watch what you said in our debate, in reply to Chalmer’s query about my list of nativist claims: http://tinyurl.com/lecunmarcusdebate …, perhaps 1:15 in, where you denied all my nativist proposals, even convolution. please reconcile with what you say below.https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/957766752481443845 …
-
Seems this article would be relevant: https://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_iccv_2015/papers/Feng_Learning_The_Structure_ICCV_2015_paper.pdf …
Cool, but this [Feng and Darrell] is more innate structure, not less, no? Better innate learning mechanisms => better results [= point of my second January arXiv paper. And @ylecun’s 1989 tech report]
-
-
Yes, good point. IBP-based convnet structure selection would not be structure-free itself, indeed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.