@GaryMarcus read "How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition?" Why focus on that info sparse fuzzy high level stuff?
-
-
Replying to @KordingLab
@KordingLab "fuzzy high level stuff" only matters if you care about language & human cognition. see http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/08/why-cant-my-computer-understand-me.html … cc@neuroecology1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus
@GaryMarcus@neuroecology yeah cognition is a useful coprocessor for movement. But whats optimal in a coprocessor is hard to know.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KordingLab
@KordingLab@GaryMarcus@neuroecology Don't know if I wd call language a "coprocessor for movement" but we never claimed optimality either.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.