Attack on @fivethirtyeight and Bayes that misunderstands almost everything about Bayesian stats and SIlver's examples. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/01/what-nate-silver-gets-wrong.html …
-
-
Replying to @stochastician
@stochastician I say that just on instinct having seen him be opposed to the deep learning folks. But I don't know his past very well.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @johnmyleswhite
@johnmyleswhite@stochastician I didn't get past the author calling what the people at http://www.nutonian.com/ are doing "ridiculous"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dmarthal
@dmarthal here it is http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/01/what-nate-silver-gets-wrong.html … it's about Nate Silver and how Baysian probabilities aren't 100% accurate1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @tmarthal
@tmarthal @SimonHorrobin Tx for Nate Silver RT! You might also enjoy Cleaning Up Sci & other essays at http://tinyurl.com/gfmtny
9:14 PM - 27 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.