.@garymarcus is right that Bayes methods no cure-all but wrong to say N Silver claims/suggests this @fivethirtyeight http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/01/what-nate-silver-gets-wrong.html …
@JSEllenberg (re)read chapter 1 section on Bayes - think differently - and one-sided discussion of Fisher in Chapter 8.
-
-
.
@GaryMarcus@jsellenberg facts are that Bayes is still "think different" http://bit.ly/13JikhR -
@tristanzajonc@GaryMarcus Facts are that Bayesian methods (for better + worse) are MUCH LIKE ordinary thinking, not "different thinking"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.