The claim that @fivethirtyeight is wrong to to argue that Bayesian reasoning is under-used is nuts.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/01/what-nate-silver-gets-wrong.html?mbid=social_retweet …
-
-
Replying to @JustinWolfers
@justinwolfers that’s not what we said… confused by yr tweet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus
@GaryMarcus I can't argue what your intentions were, but that's not what I took from your piece (tho obviously hard to summarize in <140).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @JustinWolfers
@justinwolfers dm email address? Agree too complex for < 140
5:17 PM - 25 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.