.@GaryMarcus @doctorow @NewYorker Unless the EULA requires it, you didn't volunteer to save the people in the bus, so no.
@doctorow Your #driverless car is about to hit a bus; should it veer off a bridge? Machine ethics @newyorker http://nyr.kr/XYBIYQ
-
-
-
@russnelson@doctorow agreed: it’s all about the EULA (and whether anybody reads what’s within).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@GaryMarcus@doctorow@newyorker: Would it adapt to local manners? -- Honking in NYC, being passive-aggressive in SEA?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GaryMarcus@doctorow@NewYorker Geeeeeez! Don't put this stuff in my head right before bedtime. Scary dreams in the making!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GaryMarcus@doctorow@NewYorker If only Asimov were alive and on Twitter, eh?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GaryMarcus@doctorow@NewYorker Actually driverless cars have a much better safety record then human operated cars. -
@fuzzytroll@GaryMarcus@NewYorker That's a perfect non-sequitur - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@GaryMarcus@doctorow@NewYorker AI car a) won't hit a bus. A bus will hit it, unless it's ai. B) it will parse better options. REVERSE!!!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GaryMarcus@doctorow@NewYorker Easy answer: like any tool, AIs are responsible to their owners. So default saving owner, but make setting.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.