Anybody else see a problem with highly-paid researchers at leading institutions refusing to engage in reading outside their own discipline? (Aside: book in question-The Algebraic Mind-is not general audience; it's a technical book in MIT Press's prestigious Bradford series.)https://twitter.com/zergylord/status/1200694810904018945 …
-
By outside my own discipline, do you mean cognitive psychology? Like the subject I got my PhD in? I'm well versed. And I've read your book. It's a useful review with some interesting new ideas, but isn't detailed or focused enough to be the subject of follow-up work.
show me your system for handling - universally quantified one-to-one mappings - type-token distinction or - structured representations And I will think you have something substantive to say; otherwise you are just trying to blow off those ideas without anything substantive.
-
-
The latter two are broad topics that aren't unique to your work. The former is pretty unique, but lumping it in with the more polemical and/or didactic chapters doesn't do it justice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.