Anybody else see a problem with highly-paid researchers at leading institutions refusing to engage in reading outside their own discipline? (Aside: book in question-The Algebraic Mind-is not general audience; it's a technical book in MIT Press's prestigious Bradford series.)https://twitter.com/zergylord/status/1200694810904018945 …
-
I meant something newer, like this one https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-019-01602-z …. What's your last answer to Zuidema?
He's not denying existence of rules (= operations over variables), he's (very reasonably) asking for more detail. It's certainly not a refutation of my original view, and it shows that the issues raised by my 1999 Science article continue to be important & unresolved.
-
-
This is the paper that prompted him to say case closed. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.00180.pdf … I am not sure. Specially I am not sure whether he doesn't smuggle symbolic machinery. Too much to read, but I will.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.