Anybody else see a problem with highly-paid researchers at leading institutions refusing to engage in reading outside their own discipline? (Aside: book in question-The Algebraic Mind-is not general audience; it's a technical book in MIT Press's prestigious Bradford series.)https://twitter.com/zergylord/status/1200694810904018945 …
-
-
Replying to @GaryMarcus
refusing to engage in reading your book being the specific case here; who knows what else they read?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danbri @GaryMarcus
Norbert Wiener's 1948 Cybernetics was a very good book. :-D I wonder if
@GaryMarcus the many books on Cybernetics or later books involving Complex Adaptive Systems. A lot of the Enactivist Cognition arose out of this. My suspicion is that he has not. I could be wrong though.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I suspect this is more to do with a philosophical stance. This has been ongoing for over half a century:pic.twitter.com/FtQowblc6G
2 replies 20 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @IntuitMachine @GaryMarcus
this is an old story for sure, but the worldview implicit in those charts is that there are only two interesting directions seems a bit limiting
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
that's what I am saying, in a different way
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.