Anybody else see a problem with highly-paid researchers at leading institutions refusing to engage in reading outside their own discipline? (Aside: book in question-The Algebraic Mind-is not general audience; it's a technical book in MIT Press's prestigious Bradford series.)https://twitter.com/zergylord/status/1200694810904018945 …
-
I will read it in the near furture. Also, I read Marantz saying both camps of the words and rules debate were wrong, but specially the words & rules theory. I always wished you or
@sapinker commented that stuff, but as Pinker once wrote, whatever happed to the past tense debate.
which specific claim of Marantz? Tons of people to tried to model the data from my thesis, never in my view successfully. I review it all in Chapter 3 of The Algebraic Mind, don't think there has been major innovation since.
-
-
just tangentially. let me search the paper.
-
I think I read this: https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ml.1.1.07sto … but this seems to be more like "all rules" theory.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.