I don't buy the common sense db idea. I think that common sense is a living thing, generated on the fly, not knowledge stored in a data base. (Then again, even Minsky told me it's a good idea, and who am I to disagree with Minsky. I also admit that I have little common sense.)
*nobody* knows the #AI and #ML answers, but here is my proposal for research direction, per @kchonyc’s query, and per The Algebraic Mind; more consistent w @pmdomingos and @egrefen and Josh Tenenbaum etc than pure deep learning. (also perhaps in line with @mpshanahan?)https://twitter.com/garymarcus/status/1200636202744868864 …
-
-
-
it’s got to be some of both. we can’t generate it all on the fly, and we have to generate some of it on the fly kudos to you by the way in taking the high road here & actually engaging in the substance of the proposed changed in direction; that’s exactly what the field needs.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
OTOH, *many people* can contribute with valuable insights. But more than a problem of lacking proposals we lack attention to those outside our entrenched positions
-
@Zergylord take note
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes to structured representations. But not necessarily everywhere, and allow learning to shape them. Common sense essential. Not sure about a common sense database, though; I don't think the concept of an object can be usefully specified in declarative sentences, for instance
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess you wanted to reference
@pmddomingos (not@PmDomingos )
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.