@GaryMarcus I would like in fact to hear a solid and testable proposal based on your 20 years of insisting how ML is not on the right track (as you said in an earlier tweet in this week), instead of another essay.https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1200613819518599169 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @kchonyc
The solid proposal is that we need to search a different part of model space, as described in detail in 2001, where I made several specifics proposals about important challenges that the ML community simply has refused (for the most part) to engage with. I can't do it on my own.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus
@GaryMarcus "search a different part of model space" is not a testable proposal, nor your whole book from 2001 is. I wanted to hear what that different part is, in equations or pseudo code.3 replies 0 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @kchonyc
- look at relationships between variables, a la ILP and MLNs and some recent work in differentiable programming - include a type-token distinction - don’t waste your time with bags of features; only consider architectures with structured representations - learn a common sense db
3 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @GaryMarcus @kchonyc
These are things you'd like a model to do or have, not a description of a model that does or has
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
-
-
Replying to @GaryMarcus @kchonyc
I'm glad.
@kchonyc is precisely asking for the latter, though1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.