I'll remind you that yesterday you referred to me as having "shocking hubris". But yeah, sorry if my pointing out that you don't seem to be aware of all the applications of ANNs in neuroscience was too insulting for you.
just because we don’t agree doesn’t mean you have to insult me. @tyrell_turing you just dropped level of discussion w long series of tweets questioning my motives.
i see the work you present as promissory rather than decisive; & stand by view that you are rushing to judgementhttps://twitter.com/tyrell_turing/status/1200456696205848577 …
-
-
-
Science is a busy place and I am sure there are papers I haven't read. Many examples still seem like classification to me, & most such studies I have seen explain eg half the variance, which very much leaves causality open. But I am open to other examples, if presented civilly.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
well ANN's certainly don't explain human arrogance
I 'd love to see a model that explains why my 3 year "thinks" he understands so much yet knows so little. you need much more sophisticated models of approximation / symbolic-ish to do that. -
if your 3-year old is typical he probably overestimates his knowledge but also probably knows more about language, social cognition and dynamic motor control than any robot that has yet been built.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Let’s not get angry here...time will tell
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really sad to see how successful researchers from different fields fail to collaborate. Instead they battle on a subject without agreement on necessary definitions which could provid a better starting point for fruitful discussions and prevent misunderstandings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.