Both ANNs and brains are (1) highly distributed and parallel (2) make small changes (3) efficient. Ideas like generalization hold for all systems with these three properties. In that sense, @tyrell_turing is obviously right. Maybe @GaryMarcus uses narrow def of abstraction.https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1200088188934451200 …
-
-
My beef with the “ANN are abstractions of the Brain” trope is that it is so vague that it is almost meaningless. It purposefully avoid all the things our models don’t include 1/2
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
It's not vague at all, lemme make it concrete for you: 1) Neurons do something very close to linear integration followed by a non-linearity. 2) They do this in a parallel manner, leading to distributed representations. 3) ANNs capture this in a simple model. Period.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
“knowing” (1) has not carried us very far in neuroscience, and I think it is entirely possible that (1) is in some way misguided; we don’t even know with certainty that the individual neuron is the best level of analysis.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.