Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GaryMarcus's profile
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus

Tweets

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

CEO/Founder of http://Robust.AI ; cognitive scientist, and best-selling author. New book: http://Rebooting.AI : Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust

garymarcus.com
Joined December 2010

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Nov 28
      • Report Tweet

      Gary Marcus Retweeted Blake Richards

      astonished that anyone knowledgeable could claim that neural nets are (obviously) an “abstraction of neural processing” when we don’t yet know how brains work. if you don’t know how Y works you can’t really speak with certainty about whether X is an abstraction of Y. Period.https://twitter.com/tyrell_turing/status/1200072223299657728 …

      Gary Marcus added,

      Blake Richards @tyrell_turing
      Replying to @tyrell_turing @GaryMarcus and 5 others
      I am amazed at how many ppl resist this basic fact! Folks: you may believe ANNs miss critical biological details, cool, that's a legit position to take. But why pretend that ANNs are not an abstraction of neural processing? That is simply not a tenable position, frankly.
      45 replies 58 retweets 324 likes
    2. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing Nov 28
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @GaryMarcus

      Gary, we know some things about how brains work, and we know that ANNs can capture these aspects. This is very well established. You are confusing two statements: (1) ANNs are an abstraction of neural processing (true). (2) ANNs are a good model of the brain (? - TBD).

      7 replies 1 retweet 47 likes
      Gary Marcus‏ @GaryMarcus Nov 28
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @tyrell_turing

      If we don't know the answer to (2), how can we be sure about the answer to (1)?

      9:15 AM - 28 Nov 2019
      • 10 Likes
      • Stuart Sims Giorgio Robino James Salsman 📎 Cedric Vicera Tarin Ziyaee Ryan Saxe Kort Driessen Terence Plizga Alok Damle
      4 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Grace Lindsay‏ @neurograce Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing

          We know enough of the basics of how individual neurons turn inputs to outputs to create an abstraction of that process. That is the solid statement that supports (1). (2) is dependent on how neurons interact & what further complexities are needed to capture all the brain does.

          1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes
        3. Grace Lindsay‏ @neurograce Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @neurograce @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing

          It may be fruitful & fashionable to say we dont understand anything about the brain & so cant model it. But that's simply not how modeling works. Its iterative and you go with your best guess until contradictory evidence provides you with a better one.

          3 replies 2 retweets 44 likes
        4. 6 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Brad Wyble‏ @bradpwyble Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing

          These are two different levels of abstraction. I agree that we can simulate how neural processing works at a micro level without understanding how the brain works at a macro level.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        3. Alok Damle‏ @alok_damle Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @bradpwyble @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing

          Electrical signal transfer over ethernet can be physically detected and can be simulated. But without the understanding of TCP/IP, a meaningful communication can never happen. If a map of physical nodes and links of entire Internet is drawn, it will look similar to a neural net.

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Andrew Pruszynski‏ @andpru Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing

          Because "abstraction".

          1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
        3. Blake Richards‏ @tyrell_turing Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @andpru @GaryMarcus

          Yes, exactly...pic.twitter.com/2dtjD6y3UR

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. Twain‏ @twainus Nov 28
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @GaryMarcus @tyrell_turing

          The fields of AI and neuroscience get into all kinds of pointless beefs simply because people confuse and conflate all sorts of things. @element_ai @ylecun @GoogleAI @facebookai @zacharylipton @dileeplearning @realGeordieRose @albertwenger @kaifulee @sama @BaiduResearchpic.twitter.com/pM3S9Jz5kG

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info