Never knew about them. Found their Wikipedia page & truth to say, I'm unimpressed. In fact, I'm a bit alarmed.
First impression is that this is actually "answering to the test" on steroids. Maybe that's what the parents wanted & so the model works? 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindspark?wprov=sfla1 …
-
That large proportions of people have reading skills lower than high-end NLP a) has been demonstrated by the
@oecd b) hasn’t been taken adequately into account by the#agi#singularity#Futureofwork panic crowds.
) and that's not getting fixed soon enough for 
more generally @j2bryson what does your tweet even mean? is there a typo? what OECD study? what was the metric? what implications? having a hard time making sense of what you said.
-
-
The limit case is obvious – some people are fully illiterate so lots of AI gets more from text than they do. I'm illiterate in Chinese, for example. The OECD at their 2017 AI meeting talked about a study that showed that 70% of EU citizens can't do analyses top-end AI can 1/2
-
Actually, the report of the 2017
@OECD meeting I participated in (AI: Intelligent Machines, Smart Policies :-) https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/f1a650d9-en.pdf?expires=1573939644&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A76A1177FCC38BEE4F8E51BF870C358C … says on 11% of EU adults are above the level of AI (see picture), and cites this paper https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/computers-and-the-future-of-skill-demand_9789264284395-en …pic.twitter.com/SdwZWybDGx
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.